KIM vs. MAA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at KIM and MAA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and MAA are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

Symbol	KIM	MAA
Company Name	Kimco Realty Corporation	Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry	Retail REITs	Residential REITs
Market Capitalization	15.03 billion USD	17.05 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 22, 1991	January 28, 1994
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and MAA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. MAA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	MAA
5-Day Price Return	2.30%	-0.26%
13-Week Price Return	7.71%	-8.02%
26-Week Price Return	3.11%	-9.80%
52-Week Price Return	-2.72%	-7.90%
Month-to-Date Return	4.57%	-0.28%
Year-to-Date Return	-5.25%	-8.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.19M	0.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.44M	0.92M
3-Month Volatility	19.80%	18.38%
Beta	1.35	0.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 15.84%
Q3: 10.01%
Median: 5.58%
Q1: 2.80%
Min: -2.65%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MAA

9.60%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 12.21%
Q3: 9.45%
Median: 7.42%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.37%

In the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry, MAA’s Return on Equity of 9.60% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 72.99%
Q3: 48.25%
Median: 27.21%
Q1: 13.68%
Min: -25.48%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

MAA

25.98%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 67.49%
Q3: 38.86%
Median: 25.74%
Q1: 7.62%
Min: 0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 102.11%
Q3: 53.88%
Median: 35.05%
Q1: 20.90%
Min: -8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MAA

29.76%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 54.06%
Q3: 45.82%
Median: 29.89%
Q1: 19.34%
Min: 5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	MAA
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.66%	9.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.99%	4.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	28.54%	25.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.62%	29.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	68.89%	58.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 1.54
Q3: 0.87
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.04

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MAA

0.13

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 1.28
Q3: 0.64
Median: 0.21
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

MAA’s Current Ratio of 0.13 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 1.96
Q3: 1.36
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.28

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MAA

0.85

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 1.62
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.28

MAA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 4.31
Q3: 3.35
Median: 2.33
Q1: 1.37
Min: 0.52

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAA

4.01

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 5.11
Q3: 4.01
Median: 2.53
Q1: 1.52
Min: 0.52

MAA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	MAA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.47	0.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.47	0.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.78	0.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.05	4.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. MAA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. MAA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.78%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 6.40%
Q3: 4.96%
Median: 4.61%
Q1: 3.75%
Min: 2.91%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.78% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAA

4.21%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 4.21%
Q3: 3.83%
Median: 3.40%
Q1: 3.27%
Min: 2.80%

MAA’s Dividend Yield of 4.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 233.72%
Q3: 148.83%
Median: 90.03%
Q1: 67.83%
Min: 12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAA

122.73%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 210.87%
Q3: 145.45%
Median: 102.94%
Q1: 84.58%
Min: 17.15%

MAA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 122.73% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	MAA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.78%	4.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	117.45%	122.73%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

24.58

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 69.12
Q3: 38.21
Median: 21.85
Q1: 15.96
Min: 6.82

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

MAA

29.16

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 177.01
Q3: 109.22
Median: 31.26
Q1: 25.84
Min: 8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

7.02

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 13.84
Q3: 9.05
Median: 7.00
Q1: 5.56
Min: 2.93

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MAA

7.58

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 12.50
Q3: 10.33
Median: 8.01
Q1: 6.55
Min: 5.06

MAA’s P/S Ratio of 7.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.73
Median: 1.08
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.48

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAA

2.93

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 4.49
Q3: 2.83
Median: 2.20
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.67

MAA’s P/B Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KIM vs. MAA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	MAA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	24.58	29.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.02	7.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.35	2.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	30.25	71.10