Seek Returns logo

KIM vs. LINE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KIM and LINE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and LINE are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolKIMLINE
Company NameKimco Realty CorporationLineage, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryRetail REITsIndustrial REITs
Market Capitalization14.54 billion USD10.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 22, 1991July 25, 2024
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and LINE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. LINE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKIMLINE
5-Day Price Return-0.92%4.65%
13-Week Price Return-0.69%-8.48%
26-Week Price Return1.08%-32.13%
52-Week Price Return-6.49%-47.83%
Month-to-Date Return-1.74%3.60%
Year-to-Date Return-8.37%-31.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.29M1.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.05M1.14M
3-Month Volatility19.19%33.36%
Beta1.090.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
16.17%
Q3
9.03%
Median
6.12%
Q1
3.81%
Min
-3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LINE

-6.44%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
10.99%
Q3
7.24%
Median
6.40%
Q1
4.30%
Min
2.83%

LINE has a negative Return on Equity of -6.44%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
75.53%
Q3
49.82%
Median
28.35%
Q1
20.68%
Min
-8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

LINE

-10.57%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
88.84%
Q3
58.75%
Median
43.88%
Q1
29.92%
Min
-10.57%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
58.14%
Median
38.63%
Q1
25.00%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

LINE

-8.78%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
117.14%
Q3
71.64%
Median
46.46%
Q1
38.78%
Min
-8.78%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKIMLINE
Return on Equity (TTM)5.66%-6.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%-2.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.54%-10.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.62%-8.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.89%32.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.97
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LINE

0.96

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.91
Median
0.55
Q1
0.22
Min
0.09

LINE’s Current Ratio of 0.96 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.27
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LINE

0.82

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.29
Q3
0.79
Median
0.67
Q1
0.45
Min
0.19

LINE’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Industrial REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.30
Median
2.15
Q1
1.29
Min
-0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LINE

-0.82

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
14.64
Q3
8.83
Median
2.42
Q1
0.90
Min
-0.82

LINE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.82. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKIMLINE
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.470.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.780.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.05-0.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. LINE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. LINE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.85%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.10%
Median
4.50%
Q1
3.89%
Min
2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.85% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LINE

0.00%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
7.45%
Q3
5.52%
Median
4.10%
Q1
3.26%
Min
0.00%

LINE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
195.40%
Q3
125.60%
Median
85.02%
Q1
51.07%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LINE

0.00%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
190.40%
Q3
122.05%
Median
103.86%
Q1
62.74%
Min
0.00%

LINE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKIMLINE
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.45%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

24.20

Retail REITs Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
28.02
Median
21.98
Q1
15.79
Min
6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

LINE

--

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
40.73
Q3
30.93
Median
24.53
Q1
15.87
Min
5.37

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Industrial REITs industry.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

6.91

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.05
Q3
9.54
Median
6.95
Q1
5.59
Min
3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 6.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LINE

1.72

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
13.93
Q3
11.34
Median
9.30
Q1
7.75
Min
5.26

LINE’s P/S Ratio of 1.72 falls below the typical floor for the Industrial REITs industry. This could suggest the stock is overlooked or deeply undervalued relative to its sales, but may also reflect significant market concerns about its future.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.64
Median
1.05
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LINE

1.15

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.97
Q3
1.51
Median
1.17
Q1
0.92
Min
0.70

LINE’s P/B Ratio of 1.15 is within the conventional range for the Industrial REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM vs. LINE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKIMLINE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.20--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.911.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.351.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.7750.88