KIM vs. LAMR: Kimco Realty vs. Lamar Advertising Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Kimco Realty (KIM) and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but KIM is classified in Retail REITs while LAMR is classified in Specialized REITs.

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 56.42% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Kimco Realty (KIM) at 7.20%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Neither Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Lamar Advertising (LAMR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 5.06% and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 2.68% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Lamar Advertising (LAMR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Kimco Realty (KIM) at 1.05 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 0.59 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LAMR.

Kimco Realty (KIM) at 0.83 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 4.82 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 4.14% and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 4.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Lamar Advertising (LAMR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Lamar Advertising (LAMR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

On P/S ratio, both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 7.72 and Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 6.70 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Kimco Realty (KIM) at 1.67 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Lamar Advertising (LAMR) at 15.58 prices above its benchmark range — LAMR looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics