Seek Returns logo

KIM vs. LAMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KIM and LAMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and LAMR are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolKIMLAMR
Company NameKimco Realty CorporationLamar Advertising Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryRetail REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization14.54 billion USD12.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 22, 1991August 2, 1996
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and LAMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. LAMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKIMLAMR
5-Day Price Return-0.92%1.90%
13-Week Price Return-0.69%-0.81%
26-Week Price Return1.08%8.30%
52-Week Price Return-6.49%-6.30%
Month-to-Date Return-1.74%0.65%
Year-to-Date Return-8.37%1.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.29M0.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.05M0.56M
3-Month Volatility19.19%24.29%
Beta1.091.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
16.17%
Q3
9.03%
Median
6.12%
Q1
3.81%
Min
-3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LAMR

41.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
17.78%
Median
8.42%
Q1
6.83%
Min
-1.71%

LAMR’s Return on Equity of 41.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
75.53%
Q3
49.82%
Median
28.35%
Q1
20.68%
Min
-8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

LAMR

19.72%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
70.20%
Q3
38.00%
Median
23.98%
Q1
6.53%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
58.14%
Median
38.63%
Q1
25.00%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

LAMR

27.46%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
54.03%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.28%
Min
5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKIMLAMR
Return on Equity (TTM)5.66%41.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%6.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.54%19.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.62%27.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.89%81.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.97
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LAMR

0.58

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.08
Median
0.58
Q1
0.34
Min
0.10

LAMR’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.27
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LAMR

3.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.73
Min
0.16

LAMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.73 is typical for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.30
Median
2.15
Q1
1.29
Min
-0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LAMR

3.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
3.92
Median
2.94
Q1
2.07
Min
1.14

LAMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKIMLAMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.470.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.58
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.783.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.053.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. LAMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. LAMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.85%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.10%
Median
4.50%
Q1
3.89%
Min
2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.85% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LAMR

5.09%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.29%
Median
4.71%
Q1
3.25%
Min
2.16%

LAMR’s Dividend Yield of 5.09% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
195.40%
Q3
125.60%
Median
85.02%
Q1
51.07%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LAMR

104.38%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
338.69%
Q3
202.75%
Median
125.21%
Q1
107.89%
Min
16.73%

LAMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 104.38% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKIMLAMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.85%5.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.45%104.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

24.20

Retail REITs Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
28.02
Median
21.98
Q1
15.79
Min
6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

LAMR

28.11

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
119.95
Q3
64.19
Median
27.78
Q1
23.88
Min
5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

6.91

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.05
Q3
9.54
Median
6.95
Q1
5.59
Min
3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 6.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LAMR

5.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.35
Q3
8.84
Median
8.28
Q1
5.39
Min
1.68

LAMR’s P/S Ratio of 5.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.64
Median
1.05
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LAMR

13.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
13.73
Q3
7.48
Median
2.56
Q1
1.70
Min
0.71

LAMR’s P/B Ratio of 13.73 is in the upper tier for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KIM vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKIMLAMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.2028.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.915.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.3513.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.7717.09