Seek Returns logo

KGC vs. SHW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KGC and SHW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKGCSHW
Company NameKinross Gold CorporationThe Sherwin-Williams Company
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
Market Capitalization30.86 billion USD82.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1981March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KGC and SHW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KGC vs. SHW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKGCSHW
5-Day Price Return0.11%-3.03%
13-Week Price Return36.57%-8.84%
26-Week Price Return86.33%-6.70%
52-Week Price Return170.45%-14.23%
Month-to-Date Return9.44%-3.70%
Year-to-Date Return167.42%-2.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.95M2.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.23M1.99M
3-Month Volatility48.74%23.17%
Beta1.031.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KGC

21.65%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, KGC’s Return on Equity of 21.65% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SHW

60.49%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.58%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-12.53%

SHW’s Return on Equity of 60.49% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KGC

27.31%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.31% places KGC in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SHW

11.05%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.17%
Q3
9.38%
Median
4.26%
Q1
0.56%
Min
-8.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.05% places SHW in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KGC

41.22%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.22% places KGC in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SHW

14.22%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.38%
Q3
14.36%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-9.26%

SHW’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.22% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKGCSHW
Return on Equity (TTM)21.65%60.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.89%10.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.31%11.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.22%14.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%48.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KGC

2.84

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

KGC’s Current Ratio of 2.84 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SHW

0.82

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.27
Median
1.75
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

SHW’s Current Ratio of 0.82 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KGC

0.16

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

KGC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.16 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SHW

2.60

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.00
Median
0.65
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.60, SHW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Chemicals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KGC

46.86

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

KGC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 46.86 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SHW

9.47

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
27.42
Median
9.48
Q1
3.36
Min
-9.39

SHW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKGCSHW
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.840.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.430.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.162.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)46.869.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

KGC vs. SHW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KGC vs. SHW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KGC

0.48%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KGC’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SHW

0.94%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
3.88%
Median
2.60%
Q1
1.39%
Min
0.00%

SHW’s Dividend Yield of 0.94% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KGC

8.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

KGC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.35% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SHW

30.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
109.29%
Median
62.55%
Q1
30.93%
Min
0.00%

SHW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.09% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKGCSHW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.48%0.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.35%30.09%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KGC

17.50

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

KGC’s P/E Ratio of 17.50 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SHW

31.97

Chemicals Industry

Max
48.58
Q3
28.65
Median
19.88
Q1
14.03
Min
6.73

A P/E Ratio of 31.97 places SHW in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KGC

4.78

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

KGC’s P/S Ratio of 4.78 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SHW

3.53

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.61
Q3
2.21
Median
0.95
Q1
0.58
Min
0.17

SHW’s P/S Ratio of 3.53 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KGC

2.46

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

KGC’s P/B Ratio of 2.46 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SHW

19.51

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
2.61
Median
1.50
Q1
0.96
Min
0.33

At 19.51, SHW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KGC vs. SHW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKGCSHW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.5031.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.783.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4619.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.7530.72