Seek Returns logo

KGC vs. LYB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KGC and LYB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKGCLYB
Company NameKinross Gold CorporationLyondellBasell Industries N.V.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
Market Capitalization23.34 billion USD17.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1981April 28, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KGC and LYB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KGC vs. LYB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKGCLYB
5-Day Price Return-1.22%3.79%
13-Week Price Return35.02%-6.51%
26-Week Price Return48.99%-27.43%
52-Week Price Return102.74%-42.94%
Month-to-Date Return16.87%-4.49%
Year-to-Date Return94.08%-25.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.86M4.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.51M4.32M
3-Month Volatility41.42%46.68%
Beta1.480.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KGC

14.61%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

KGC’s Return on Equity of 14.61% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LYB

2.08%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

LYB’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KGC

25.18%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.18% places KGC in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LYB

0.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KGC

39.42%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.42% places KGC in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LYB

1.52%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.52% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKGCLYB
Return on Equity (TTM)14.61%2.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.86%0.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.18%0.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.42%1.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.10%9.47%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KGC

2.01

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

KGC’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LYB

1.77

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KGC

0.21

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

KGC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYB

0.99

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LYB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KGC

46.86

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

KGC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 46.86 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LYB

3.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKGCLYB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.011.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.210.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)46.863.85

Growth

Revenue Growth

KGC vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KGC vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KGC

0.65%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KGC’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYB

10.12%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Yield of 10.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KGC

9.64%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

KGC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.64% is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LYB

152.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKGCLYB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%10.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.64%152.02%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KGC

14.88

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

KGC’s P/E Ratio of 14.88 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LYB

66.07

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

At 66.07, LYB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KGC

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

KGC’s P/S Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LYB

0.49

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KGC

1.73

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

KGC’s P/B Ratio of 1.73 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LYB

1.56

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KGC vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKGCLYB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.8866.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.750.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.731.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.476.72