Seek Returns logo

KEN vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KEN and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKENVST
Company NameKenon Holdings Ltd.Vistra Corp.
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity ProducersIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization3.35 billion USD69.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 15, 2015October 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KEN and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KEN vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKENVST
5-Day Price Return4.77%1.92%
13-Week Price Return2.54%4.84%
26-Week Price Return45.28%90.88%
52-Week Price Return78.86%57.35%
Month-to-Date Return4.49%5.43%
Year-to-Date Return38.82%49.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.01M4.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.02M4.83M
3-Month Volatility36.89%42.19%
Beta1.311.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KEN

34.33%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.69%
Median
7.86%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-6.69%

KEN’s Return on Equity of 34.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VST

46.24%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.69%
Median
7.86%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-6.69%

VST’s Return on Equity of 46.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KEN

63.80%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.30%
Median
8.59%
Q1
5.08%
Min
-2.06%

KEN’s Net Profit Margin of 63.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VST

14.92%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.30%
Median
8.59%
Q1
5.08%
Min
-2.06%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KEN

4.97%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
31.45%
Q3
22.28%
Median
16.08%
Q1
11.37%
Min
4.97%

KEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.97% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VST

22.38%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
31.45%
Q3
22.28%
Median
16.08%
Q1
11.37%
Min
4.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.38% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKENVST
Return on Equity (TTM)34.33%46.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.73%6.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)63.80%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.97%22.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.91%8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KEN

4.33

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.25
Median
0.81
Q1
0.66
Min
0.27

KEN’s Current Ratio of 4.33 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VST

0.90

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.25
Median
0.81
Q1
0.66
Min
0.27

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KEN

1.01

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.71
Q3
2.80
Median
1.91
Q1
1.17
Min
0.18

Falling into the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, KEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VST

4.00

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.71
Q3
2.80
Median
1.91
Q1
1.17
Min
0.18

VST’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KEN

0.92

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

KEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.92 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKENVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.330.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.330.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.014.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.925.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

KEN vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KEN vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KEN

10.52%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
5.56%
Median
3.97%
Q1
2.26%
Min
0.00%

KEN’s Dividend Yield of 10.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

VST

0.72%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
5.56%
Median
3.97%
Q1
2.26%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KEN

57.64%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
113.12%
Q3
82.87%
Median
49.83%
Q1
22.46%
Min
0.00%

KEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 57.64% is within the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VST

14.95%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
113.12%
Q3
82.87%
Median
49.83%
Q1
22.46%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKENVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)10.52%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.64%14.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KEN

4.87

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.87
Q3
23.80
Median
10.75
Q1
8.70
Min
4.34

In the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, KEN’s P/E Ratio of 4.87 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VST

29.07

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.87
Q3
23.80
Median
10.75
Q1
8.70
Min
4.34

A P/E Ratio of 29.07 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KEN

3.11

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.59
Q3
3.75
Median
2.31
Q1
0.81
Min
0.42

KEN’s P/S Ratio of 3.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VST

4.34

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.59
Q3
3.75
Median
2.31
Q1
0.81
Min
0.42

VST’s P/S Ratio of 4.34 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KEN

1.56

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
2.06
Median
1.40
Q1
0.88
Min
0.33

KEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VST

13.64

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
2.06
Median
1.40
Q1
0.88
Min
0.33

At 13.64, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KEN vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKENVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)4.8729.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.114.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.5613.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.2144.99