Seek Returns logo

KDP vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KDP and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KDP is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolKDPUL
Company NameKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization47.79 billion USD155.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 7, 2008March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KDP and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KDP vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKDPUL
5-Day Price Return1.59%3.92%
13-Week Price Return3.99%-0.93%
26-Week Price Return10.39%6.66%
52-Week Price Return-1.24%-2.07%
Month-to-Date Return7.75%6.44%
Year-to-Date Return9.53%3.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.15M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.05M2.43M
3-Month Volatility17.08%15.01%
Beta0.470.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKDPUL
Return on Equity (TTM)6.23%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.89%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.93%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKDPUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.640.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.330.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.671.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.6022.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

KDP vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KDP vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KDP

2.56%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 2.56% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKDPUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.56%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.58%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KDP

31.21

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 31.21 places KDP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.04

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KDP vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKDPUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.2123.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.042.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.807.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.4420.05