Seek Returns logo

KDP vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KDP and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKDPUBER
Company NameKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesIndustrials
GICS IndustryBeveragesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization34.75 billion USD207.04 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 7, 2008May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KDP and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KDP vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKDPUBER
5-Day Price Return-0.62%2.76%
13-Week Price Return-23.98%2.73%
26-Week Price Return-28.21%42.13%
52-Week Price Return-29.24%33.10%
Month-to-Date Return0.27%1.34%
Year-to-Date Return-20.36%64.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume16.76M14.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.71M18.52M
3-Month Volatility33.59%28.35%
Beta0.361.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKDPUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)6.23%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.89%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.93%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKDPUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.330.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.60-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

KDP vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KDP vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KDP

3.55%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKDPUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.55%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.58%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KDP

22.53

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

KDP’s P/E Ratio of 22.53 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

16.43

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KDP

2.20

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 2.20 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.38, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KDP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKDPUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.5316.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.204.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.808.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.9724.29