Seek Returns logo

KDP vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KDP and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKDPTTWO
Company NameKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryBeveragesEntertainment
Market Capitalization34.75 billion USD47.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 7, 2008April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KDP and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KDP vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKDPTTWO
5-Day Price Return-0.62%0.44%
13-Week Price Return-23.98%6.54%
26-Week Price Return-28.21%23.52%
52-Week Price Return-29.24%69.55%
Month-to-Date Return0.27%-0.11%
Year-to-Date Return-20.36%40.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume16.76M1.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.71M1.81M
3-Month Volatility33.59%24.38%
Beta0.360.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKDPTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)6.23%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.89%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.93%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKDPTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.331.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.60-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

KDP vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KDP vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KDP

3.55%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKDPTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.55%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.58%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KDP

22.53

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

KDP’s P/E Ratio of 22.53 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KDP

2.20

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 2.20 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTWO

8.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KDP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKDPTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.53--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.208.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8012.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.97212.87