Seek Returns logo

KDP vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KDP and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKDPTEAM
Company NameKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.Atlassian Corporation
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryBeveragesSoftware
Market Capitalization40.37 billion USD45.09 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 7, 2008December 9, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KDP and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KDP vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKDPTEAM
5-Day Price Return-15.57%4.43%
13-Week Price Return-9.58%-18.57%
26-Week Price Return-12.69%-39.90%
52-Week Price Return-17.74%4.16%
Month-to-Date Return-8.97%-10.38%
Year-to-Date Return-7.47%-29.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.23M2.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.22M2.43M
3-Month Volatility31.76%44.25%
Beta0.460.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-20.69%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -20.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-4.92%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.50%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKDPTEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)6.23%-20.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%-4.59%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%-4.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.89%-2.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.93%82.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEAM

1.22

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEAM

0.73

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKDPTEAM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.331.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.60-11.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

KDP vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KDP vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KDP

2.56%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 2.56% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKDPTEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.56%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.58%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KDP

31.21

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 31.21 places KDP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.04

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TEAM

8.38

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 8.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEAM

39.62

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 39.62, TEAM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KDP vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKDPTEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.21--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.048.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8039.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.4430.86