Seek Returns logo

KDP vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KDP and QCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKDPQCOM
Company NameKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryBeveragesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization42.25 billion USD168.78 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 7, 2008December 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KDP and QCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KDP vs. QCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKDPQCOM
5-Day Price Return-11.60%0.11%
13-Week Price Return-5.79%6.14%
26-Week Price Return-5.13%-10.73%
52-Week Price Return-12.81%-7.44%
Month-to-Date Return-4.75%6.58%
Year-to-Date Return-3.18%1.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.31M6.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.32M8.23M
3-Month Volatility28.41%27.79%
Beta0.471.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QCOM

42.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s Return on Equity of 42.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QCOM

26.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places QCOM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QCOM

27.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.54% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKDPQCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)6.23%42.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%20.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%26.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.89%27.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.93%55.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

QCOM

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QCOM

0.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKDPQCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.643.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.332.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.6038.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

KDP vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KDP vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KDP

2.56%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 2.56% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QCOM

2.27%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.27%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKDPQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.56%2.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.58%32.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KDP

31.21

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 31.21 places KDP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QCOM

14.43

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 14.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.04

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QCOM

3.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 3.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QCOM

6.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 6.35 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KDP vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKDPQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.2114.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.043.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.806.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.4414.38