Seek Returns logo

KDP vs. MA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KDP and MA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKDPMA
Company NameKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.Mastercard Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesFinancials
GICS IndustryBeveragesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization34.78 billion USD514.83 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 7, 2008May 25, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KDP and MA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KDP vs. MA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKDPMA
5-Day Price Return-2.82%0.00%
13-Week Price Return-22.84%1.22%
26-Week Price Return-25.10%3.60%
52-Week Price Return-31.83%15.23%
Month-to-Date Return-12.31%-4.45%
Year-to-Date Return-20.58%8.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.06M3.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.45M2.75M
3-Month Volatility33.63%15.98%
Beta0.440.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKDPMA
Return on Equity (TTM)6.23%191.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%27.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%44.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.89%55.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.93%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKDPMA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.331.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.672.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.6037.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

KDP vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KDP vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KDP

3.52%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 3.52% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MA

0.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKDPMA
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.52%0.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.58%19.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KDP

22.74

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

A P/E Ratio of 22.74 places KDP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MA

37.94

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

A P/E Ratio of 37.94 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KDP

2.22

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 2.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MA

17.05

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KDP vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKDPMA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.7437.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.2217.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8064.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.1832.49