Seek Returns logo

KBR vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KBR and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKBRPWR
Company NameKBR, Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization6.39 billion USD56.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 16, 2006February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KBR and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KBR vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKBRPWR
5-Day Price Return-0.42%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return-10.51%9.04%
26-Week Price Return-5.40%29.23%
52-Week Price Return-25.42%40.20%
Month-to-Date Return6.16%-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return-14.34%18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.31M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.43M1.19M
3-Month Volatility29.23%22.91%
Beta0.701.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KBR

24.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

KBR’s Return on Equity of 24.91% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KBR

4.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

KBR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KBR

8.72%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

KBR’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKBRPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)24.91%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.39%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.52%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.72%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)14.51%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KBR

1.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

KBR’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KBR

1.76

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

KBR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Professional Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.76. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KBR

14.81

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

KBR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKBRPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.131.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.131.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.760.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.8110.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

KBR vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KBR vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KBR

1.27%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

KBR’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KBR

22.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

KBR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKBRPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.27%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.19%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KBR

17.46

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, KBR’s P/E Ratio of 17.46 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KBR

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

KBR’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KBR

4.15

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

KBR’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KBR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKBRPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.4657.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.792.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.157.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1740.85