KB vs. SEIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at KB and SEIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KB trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SEIC is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	KB	SEIC
Company Name	KB Financial Group Inc.	SEI Investments Company
Country	South Korea	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	30.46 billion USD	10.95 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	November 13, 2001	March 25, 1981
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KB and SEIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KB vs. SEIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	KB	SEIC
5-Day Price Return	-0.35%	1.95%
13-Week Price Return	23.76%	5.83%
26-Week Price Return	25.93%	2.67%
52-Week Price Return	8.71%	37.70%
Month-to-Date Return	3.34%	0.48%
Year-to-Date Return	38.24%	7.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.91M	0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.26M	0.97M
3-Month Volatility	39.49%	18.12%
Beta	-0.00	0.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KB

9.84%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

KB’s Return on Equity of 9.84% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SEIC

29.96%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, SEIC’s Return on Equity of 29.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KB

10.66%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, KB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SEIC

31.25%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

SEIC’s Net Profit Margin of 31.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KB

14.94%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

KB’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.94% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SEIC

31.28%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

SEIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.28% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	KB	SEIC
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.84%	29.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.75%	26.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.66%	31.25%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.94%	31.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	85.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SEIC

6.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KB

2.44

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

SEIC

0.00

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

SEIC

725.60

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	KB	SEIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	6.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	6.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.44	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	725.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

KB vs. SEIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KB vs. SEIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KB

3.58%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

KB’s Dividend Yield of 3.58% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SEIC

1.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

SEIC’s Dividend Yield of 1.13% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KB

36.91%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

KB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.91% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SEIC

23.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

SEIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.07% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	KB	SEIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.58%	1.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	36.91%	23.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KB

7.25

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, KB’s P/E Ratio of 7.25 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SEIC

15.79

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

SEIC’s P/E Ratio of 15.79 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KB

0.52

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

SEIC

4.93

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

SEIC’s P/S Ratio of 4.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KB

0.71

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

KB’s P/B Ratio of 0.71 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SEIC

4.78

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

SEIC’s P/B Ratio of 4.78 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KB vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	KB	SEIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	7.25	15.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.52	4.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.71	4.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	14.68	18.49