Seek Returns logo

KB vs. KEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KB and KEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KB and KEP are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolKBKEP
Company NameKB Financial Group Inc.Korea Electric Power Corporation
CountrySouth KoreaSouth Korea
GICS SectorFinancialsUtilities
GICS IndustryBanksElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization30.34 billion USD16.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 13, 2001October 27, 1994
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KB and KEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KB vs. KEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKBKEP
5-Day Price Return3.64%-1.93%
13-Week Price Return-0.09%-1.11%
26-Week Price Return45.64%59.19%
52-Week Price Return8.71%-7.95%
Month-to-Date Return1.13%-1.53%
Year-to-Date Return40.89%77.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.78M1.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.16M4.35M
3-Month Volatility37.40%36.82%
Beta0.600.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KB

9.84%

Banks Industry

Max
25.40%
Q3
15.55%
Median
12.00%
Q1
8.98%
Min
-0.10%

KB’s Return on Equity of 9.84% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KEP

15.57%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
25.46%
Q3
14.70%
Median
10.64%
Q1
6.99%
Min
0.02%

In the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Return on Equity of 15.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KB

10.66%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.73%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.56%
Min
6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, KB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KEP

6.78%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.56%
Q3
16.54%
Median
11.20%
Q1
7.30%
Min
0.01%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 6.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KB

14.94%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.73%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
12.28%

KB’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.94% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KEP

12.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
38.77%
Q3
25.54%
Median
18.87%
Q1
14.12%
Min
0.02%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.54% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKBKEP
Return on Equity (TTM)9.84%15.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.75%2.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.66%6.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.94%12.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)---19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KEP

0.46

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.23
Median
0.98
Q1
0.72
Min
0.13

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KB

2.44

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.66
Median
1.05
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

KEP

3.18

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.90
Median
1.27
Q1
0.62
Min
0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
9.89
Median
3.33
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKBKEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)--0.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--0.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.443.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--2.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

KB vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KB vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KB

2.90%

Banks Industry

Max
11.03%
Q3
6.00%
Median
3.87%
Q1
2.41%
Min
0.00%

KB’s Dividend Yield of 2.90% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KEP

1.12%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.61%
Q3
4.66%
Median
3.55%
Q1
2.23%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KB

30.54%

Banks Industry

Max
134.24%
Q3
79.39%
Median
55.09%
Q1
36.09%
Min
0.00%

KB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.54% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KEP

6.37%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
140.33%
Q3
84.46%
Median
60.94%
Q1
31.83%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.37% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKBKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.90%1.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.54%6.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KB

7.42

Banks Industry

Max
22.69
Q3
13.75
Median
10.32
Q1
7.73
Min
2.59

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, KB’s P/E Ratio of 7.42 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

KEP

3.60

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
21.23
Median
15.47
Q1
10.17
Min
3.08

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 3.60 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KB

0.52

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

KEP

0.24

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.03
Q3
3.06
Median
1.89
Q1
1.06
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KB

0.71

Banks Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.40
Median
1.11
Q1
0.86
Min
0.29

KB’s P/B Ratio of 0.71 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

KEP

0.59

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.86
Median
1.46
Q1
1.01
Min
0.27

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.59 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

KB vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKBKEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)7.423.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.520.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.710.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.964.73