Seek Returns logo

K vs. MNST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at K and MNST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKMNST
Company NameKellanovaMonster Beverage Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization28.76 billion USD65.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of K and MNST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

K vs. MNST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKMNST
5-Day Price Return0.94%0.31%
13-Week Price Return3.41%6.48%
26-Week Price Return0.29%14.78%
52-Week Price Return2.66%31.86%
Month-to-Date Return0.87%-0.21%
Year-to-Date Return2.17%27.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.37M4.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.33M5.76M
3-Month Volatility11.90%24.14%
Beta0.240.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

K

34.57%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

K’s Return on Equity of 34.57% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

K

10.56%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.56% places K in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

K

14.67%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.67% places K in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKMNST
Return on Equity (TTM)34.57%24.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.51%19.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.56%20.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.67%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%55.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

K

0.68

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

K’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

K

1.43

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

K’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.43. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

K

49.65

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

K’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 49.65 is in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.683.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.452.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.430.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)49.65123.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

K vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

K vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

K

2.74%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

K’s Dividend Yield of 2.74% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

K

59.03%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

K’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.03% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.74%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.03%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

K

21.55

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

K’s P/E Ratio of 21.55 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MNST

42.06

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 42.06, MNST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

K

2.28

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

K’s P/S Ratio of 2.28 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MNST

8.64

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 8.64, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

K

6.72

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

At 6.72, K’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Food Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

K vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKMNST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.5542.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.288.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.728.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.5235.67