JPM vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 17, 2025

Here’s a clear look at JPM and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	JPM	TEAM
Company Name	JPMorgan Chase & Co.	Atlassian Corporation
Country	United States	Australia
GICS Sector	Financials	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Banks	Software
Market Capitalization	862.66 billion USD	41.87 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	December 9, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JPM and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JPM vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	JPM	TEAM
5-Day Price Return	2.47%	-3.56%
13-Week Price Return	9.44%	-0.09%
26-Week Price Return	27.07%	-22.64%
52-Week Price Return	34.06%	-31.98%
Month-to-Date Return	1.85%	-6.07%
Year-to-Date Return	32.20%	-34.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.11M	3.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume	8.19M	2.74M
3-Month Volatility	16.81%	43.75%
Beta	1.09	0.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JPM

16.42%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, JPM’s Return on Equity of 16.42% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TEAM

-13.91%

Software Industry

Max: 66.28%
Q3: 21.28%
Median: 9.33%
Q1: -8.77%
Min: -48.16%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -13.91%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JPM

33.26%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

JPM’s Net Profit Margin of 33.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-3.38%

Software Industry

Max: 51.92%
Q3: 19.23%
Median: 6.98%
Q1: -7.14%
Min: -41.00%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.38%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JPM

41.23%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

JPM’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.23% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-3.57%

Software Industry

Max: 60.40%
Q3: 21.25%
Median: 9.90%
Q1: -4.97%
Min: -43.50%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	JPM	TEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)	16.42%	-13.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.33%	-3.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	33.26%	-3.38%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	41.23%	-3.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	82.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JPM

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TEAM

1.26

Software Industry

Max: 4.29
Q3: 2.37
Median: 1.40
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JPM

2.95

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

TEAM

0.72

Software Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.31
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JPM

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max: 89.65
Q3: 32.64
Median: 1.00
Q1: -9.84
Min: -71.23

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	JPM	TEAM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.15
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.95	0.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	-11.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

JPM vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JPM vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JPM

1.87%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

JPM’s Dividend Yield of 1.87% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.22%
Q3: 0.11%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JPM

27.69%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

JPM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.69% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 3.29%
Q3: 2.41%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	JPM	TEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.87%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	27.69%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JPM

14.78

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

A P/E Ratio of 14.78 places JPM in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TEAM

Software Industry

Max: 145.74
Q3: 94.88
Median: 45.35
Q1: 26.66
Min: 8.80

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JPM

2.90

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

TEAM

7.70

Software Industry

Max: 25.67
Q3: 13.68
Median: 8.28
Q1: 4.95
Min: 0.90

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 7.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JPM

2.41

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

At 2.41, JPM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TEAM

30.49

Software Industry

Max: 30.67
Q3: 14.92
Median: 8.52
Q1: 3.89
Min: 0.38

TEAM’s P/B Ratio of 30.49 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JPM vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	JPM	TEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	14.78	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.90	7.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.41	30.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	4.84	28.87