Seek Returns logo

JPM vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JPM and QCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJPMQCOM
Company NameJPMorgan Chase & Co.QUALCOMM Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryBanksSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization798.88 billion USD168.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JPM and QCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JPM vs. QCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJPMQCOM
5-Day Price Return1.25%7.33%
13-Week Price Return11.72%2.94%
26-Week Price Return4.92%-7.52%
52-Week Price Return40.90%-3.87%
Month-to-Date Return-1.93%6.70%
Year-to-Date Return21.20%1.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.41M9.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.58M8.93M
3-Month Volatility17.35%28.79%
Beta1.151.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JPM

16.16%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, JPM’s Return on Equity of 16.16% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

QCOM

42.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s Return on Equity of 42.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JPM

33.26%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

JPM’s Net Profit Margin of 33.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QCOM

26.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places QCOM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JPM

41.23%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

JPM’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.23% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QCOM

27.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.54% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJPMQCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)16.16%42.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.32%20.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)33.26%26.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.23%27.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--55.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JPM

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

QCOM

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JPM

3.03

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

QCOM

0.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JPM

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJPMQCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)--3.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--2.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.030.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--38.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

JPM vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JPM vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JPM

1.94%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

JPM’s Dividend Yield of 1.94% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

QCOM

2.25%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.25%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JPM

27.49%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

JPM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.49% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJPMQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.94%2.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.49%32.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JPM

14.21

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 14.21 places JPM in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QCOM

14.57

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 14.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JPM

2.90

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

QCOM

3.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 3.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JPM

2.26

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

At 2.26, JPM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QCOM

6.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 6.35 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JPM vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJPMQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.2114.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.903.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.266.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.5314.51