Seek Returns logo

JNJ vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JNJ and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

JNJ is a standard domestic listing, while SAP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolJNJSAP
Company NameJohnson & JohnsonSAP SE
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorHealth CareInformation Technology
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsSoftware
Market Capitalization430.71 billion USD320.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962September 18, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JNJ and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JNJ vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJNJSAP
5-Day Price Return2.36%-0.88%
13-Week Price Return17.28%-10.87%
26-Week Price Return13.73%-14.46%
52-Week Price Return12.03%20.56%
Month-to-Date Return8.56%-5.54%
Year-to-Date Return23.66%0.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.34M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.37M1.57M
3-Month Volatility17.92%25.86%
Beta0.380.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JNJ

30.39%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

In the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, JNJ’s Return on Equity of 30.39% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JNJ

25.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.00% places JNJ in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JNJ

30.18%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.18% places JNJ in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJNJSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)30.39%15.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.16%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.00%18.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.18%25.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.98%73.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JNJ

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

JNJ’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JNJ

0.65

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

JNJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JNJ

34.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

JNJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJNJSAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.011.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.681.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.650.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.0132.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

JNJ vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JNJ vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JNJ

2.81%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

JNJ’s Dividend Yield of 2.81% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAP

0.99%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JNJ

53.34%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

JNJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.34% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJNJSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.81%0.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)53.34%161.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JNJ

18.99

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

JNJ’s P/E Ratio of 18.99 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAP

42.26

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 42.26 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JNJ

4.75

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

JNJ’s P/S Ratio of 4.75 is in the upper echelon for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SAP

7.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JNJ

4.68

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

JNJ’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JNJ vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJNJSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.9942.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.757.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.687.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.2037.81