Seek Returns logo

JLL vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JLL and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that JLL is a conventional stock, whereas KIM is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolJLLKIM
Company NameJones Lang LaSalle IncorporatedKimco Realty Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentRetail REITs
Market Capitalization13.99 billion USD14.62 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 17, 1997November 22, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JLL and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JLL vs. KIM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJLLKIM
5-Day Price Return-1.73%0.19%
13-Week Price Return13.25%1.61%
26-Week Price Return19.06%2.43%
52-Week Price Return10.12%-7.32%
Month-to-Date Return-1.04%-1.51%
Year-to-Date Return16.60%-8.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M3.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M4.05M
3-Month Volatility24.35%19.31%
Beta1.471.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JLL

8.26%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

JLL’s Return on Equity of 8.26% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
16.17%
Q3
9.03%
Median
6.12%
Q1
3.81%
Min
-3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JLL

2.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
75.53%
Q3
49.82%
Median
28.35%
Q1
20.68%
Min
-8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JLL

3.72%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

JLL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.72% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
58.14%
Median
38.63%
Q1
25.00%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJLLKIM
Return on Equity (TTM)8.26%5.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.29%2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.29%28.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.72%32.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.03%68.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JLL

1.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

JLL’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.97
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JLL

0.45

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

JLL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.27
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JLL

4.25

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

JLL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.30
Median
2.15
Q1
1.29
Min
-0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJLLKIM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.011.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.450.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.252.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

JLL vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JLL vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

JLL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KIM

4.75%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.10%
Median
4.50%
Q1
3.89%
Min
2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.75% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

JLL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
195.40%
Q3
125.60%
Median
85.02%
Q1
51.07%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJLLKIM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%117.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JLL

24.68

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

JLL’s P/E Ratio of 24.68 is within the middle range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KIM

24.75

Retail REITs Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
28.02
Median
21.98
Q1
15.79
Min
6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JLL

0.56

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

In the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s P/S Ratio of 0.56 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KIM

7.06

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.05
Q3
9.54
Median
6.95
Q1
5.59
Min
3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JLL

1.72

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

JLL’s P/B Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper tier for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.64
Median
1.05
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JLL vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJLLKIM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6824.75
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.567.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.721.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.1430.46