Seek Returns logo

JKHY vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JKHY and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJKHYUBER
Company NameJack Henry & Associates, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization11.77 billion USD198.45 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 20, 1985May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JKHY and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JKHY vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJKHYUBER
5-Day Price Return0.65%-0.17%
13-Week Price Return-11.09%8.14%
26-Week Price Return-3.39%17.25%
52-Week Price Return-1.29%29.80%
Month-to-Date Return-4.79%8.44%
Year-to-Date Return-7.77%57.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.01M15.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.63M20.51M
3-Month Volatility19.25%29.36%
Beta0.801.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JKHY

22.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, JKHY’s Return on Equity of 22.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JKHY

19.19%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

JKHY’s Net Profit Margin of 19.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JKHY

23.94%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

JKHY’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.94% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJKHYUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)22.07%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.68%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.19%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.94%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.71%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JKHY

1.36

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JKHY

0.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

78.80

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJKHYUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.361.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.010.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)78.80-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

JKHY vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JKHY vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JKHY

1.35%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

37.87%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.87% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJKHYUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.35%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)37.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

26.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

JKHY’s P/E Ratio of 26.34 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

5.05

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JKHY

6.54

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

JKHY’s P/B Ratio of 6.54 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JKHY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJKHYUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.3415.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.054.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.548.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.6622.90