Seek Returns logo

JKHY vs. MANH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JKHY and MANH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJKHYMANH
Company NameJack Henry & Associates, Inc.Manhattan Associates, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization11.90 billion USD13.31 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 20, 1985April 23, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JKHY and MANH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JKHY vs. MANH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJKHYMANH
5-Day Price Return-0.44%4.22%
13-Week Price Return-10.07%12.34%
26-Week Price Return-6.04%11.17%
52-Week Price Return0.41%-10.88%
Month-to-Date Return-3.80%0.24%
Year-to-Date Return-6.81%-18.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.61M0.77M
3-Month Volatility18.60%31.46%
Beta0.801.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JKHY

22.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, JKHY’s Return on Equity of 22.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MANH

80.35%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

MANH’s Return on Equity of 80.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JKHY

18.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

JKHY’s Net Profit Margin of 18.50% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MANH

20.91%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.91% places MANH in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JKHY

23.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

JKHY’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.22% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MANH

25.79%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.79% places MANH in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJKHYMANH
Return on Equity (TTM)22.07%80.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.68%30.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.50%20.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.22%25.79%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.06%56.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JKHY

1.36

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MANH

1.19

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MANH’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JKHY

0.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

MANH

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MANH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

78.80

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

MANH

35.00

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

MANH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 35.00 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJKHYMANH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.361.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.011.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)78.8035.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

JKHY vs. MANH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JKHY vs. MANH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JKHY

1.38%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Yield of 1.38% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MANH

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MANH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

37.87%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.87% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MANH

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MANH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJKHYMANH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.38%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)37.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

27.41

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

JKHY’s P/E Ratio of 27.41 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MANH

58.51

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

MANH’s P/E Ratio of 58.51 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JKHY

5.07

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

MANH

12.23

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MANH’s P/S Ratio of 12.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JKHY

6.54

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

JKHY’s P/B Ratio of 6.54 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MANH

43.01

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 43.01, MANH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JKHY vs. MANH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJKHYMANH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.4158.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.0712.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.5443.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.8642.11