Seek Returns logo

JHX vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JHX and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJHXMLM
Company NameJames Hardie Industries plcMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization11.79 billion USD37.19 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 22, 2001February 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JHX and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JHX vs. MLM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJHXMLM
5-Day Price Return5.80%2.65%
13-Week Price Return-12.77%8.66%
26-Week Price Return-39.55%25.89%
52-Week Price Return-44.22%13.47%
Month-to-Date Return-25.78%7.26%
Year-to-Date Return-38.77%19.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.21M0.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M0.42M
3-Month Volatility70.75%21.29%
Beta1.171.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JHX

20.74%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, JHX’s Return on Equity of 20.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MLM

11.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

MLM’s Return on Equity of 11.88% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JHX

10.93%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

JHX’s Net Profit Margin of 10.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MLM

16.47%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.47% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JHX

16.92%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

JHX’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.92% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MLM

23.04%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJHXMLM
Return on Equity (TTM)20.74%11.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.46%6.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.93%16.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.92%23.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.81%29.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JHX

2.10

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

JHX’s Current Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MLM

2.35

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JHX

0.52

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

JHX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MLM

0.58

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JHX

5.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

JHX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MLM

16.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJHXMLM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.102.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.551.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.3616.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

JHX vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JHX vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JHX

0.00%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

JHX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MLM

0.53%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.53% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JHX

27.21%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

JHX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.21% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MLM

17.62%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.62% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJHXMLM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.21%17.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JHX

38.96

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 38.96 places JHX in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MLM

33.15

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 33.15 places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JHX

4.26

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 4.26, JHX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MLM

5.46

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.46, MLM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JHX

4.92

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 4.92, JHX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MLM

3.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 3.53, MLM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JHX vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJHXMLM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.9633.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.265.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.923.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.4137.32