Seek Returns logo

JHX vs. LYB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JHX and LYB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJHXLYB
Company NameJames Hardie Industries plcLyondellBasell Industries N.V.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsChemicals
Market Capitalization12.67 billion USD15.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 22, 2001April 28, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JHX and LYB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JHX vs. LYB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJHXLYB
5-Day Price Return12.68%-1.30%
13-Week Price Return-21.38%-24.91%
26-Week Price Return-4.59%-22.85%
52-Week Price Return-37.47%-48.96%
Month-to-Date Return18.38%-0.71%
Year-to-Date Return-33.61%-34.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.24M4.61M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M4.63M
3-Month Volatility71.63%44.53%
Beta1.200.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JHX

15.60%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.24%
Q3
15.27%
Median
10.51%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-5.22%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, JHX’s Return on Equity of 15.60% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LYB

2.08%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

LYB’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JHX

8.75%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
44.75%
Q3
22.43%
Median
9.02%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.83%

JHX’s Net Profit Margin of 8.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LYB

0.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JHX

13.85%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.89%
Q3
18.90%
Median
11.67%
Q1
8.77%
Min
-2.06%

JHX’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.85% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYB

1.52%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.52% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJHXLYB
Return on Equity (TTM)15.60%2.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.05%0.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.75%0.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.85%1.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.17%9.47%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JHX

3.76

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
3.18
Median
2.00
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

JHX’s Current Ratio of 3.76 is in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LYB

1.77

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JHX

1.12

Construction Materials Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.82
Median
0.61
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

JHX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction Materials industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LYB

0.99

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LYB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JHX

5.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.24
Median
7.96
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

JHX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYB

3.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJHXLYB
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.761.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.200.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.120.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.363.85

Growth

Revenue Growth

JHX vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JHX vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JHX

0.00%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
4.78%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.85%
Min
0.00%

JHX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LYB

11.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Yield of 11.09% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JHX

27.21%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
149.16%
Q3
76.08%
Median
33.22%
Q1
14.03%
Min
0.00%

JHX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.21% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LYB

152.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJHXLYB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%11.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.21%152.02%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JHX

34.74

Construction Materials Industry

Max
33.62
Q3
19.63
Median
12.15
Q1
7.04
Min
2.32

At 34.74, JHX’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LYB

60.32

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

At 60.32, LYB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JHX

3.04

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.10
Median
1.35
Q1
0.67
Min
0.21

JHX’s P/S Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper echelon for the Construction Materials industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LYB

0.45

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JHX

5.22

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.48
Q3
2.26
Median
1.26
Q1
0.67
Min
0.11

At 5.22, JHX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LYB

1.56

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JHX vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJHXLYB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.7460.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.040.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.221.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.836.13