Seek Returns

JD vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at JD and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJDTSLA
Company NameJD.com, Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS Industry GroupConsumer Discretionary Distribution & RetailAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobiles
GICS Sub-IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobile Manufacturers
Market Capitalization41.15 billion USD1,608.76 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 22, 2014June 29, 2010
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

JD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TSLA is a standard domestic listing.

TSLA’s market capitalization (1,608.76 billion USD) is significantly greater than JD’s (41.15 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

JD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TSLA is a standard domestic listing.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JD and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JD
TSLA
Loading price history…
JD vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
5-Day Price Return1.46%9.13%
13-Week Price Return3.40%7.84%
26-Week Price Return-8.00%-6.18%
52-Week Price Return-46.37%50.39%
Month-to-Date Return1.89%12.24%
Year-to-Date Return6.18%-4.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.83M55.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.44M62.56M
3-Month Volatility33.50%38.29%
Beta1.071.79

TSLA carries a higher beta at 1.79, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while JD (beta: 1.07) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JD

8.55%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
52.86%
Q3
29.34%
Median
16.16%
Q1
8.94%
Min
-20.75%

JD’s Return on Equity of 8.55% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TSLA

4.77%

Automobiles Industry
Max
43.18%
Q3
7.01%
Median
3.39%
Q1
-18.91%
Min
-18.91%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 4.77% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JD

1.50%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
23.01%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.08%
Q1
4.39%
Min
-7.13%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s Net Profit Margin of 1.50% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TSLA

3.95%

Automobiles Industry
Max
22.35%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.37%
Q1
-14.50%
Min
-14.50%

TSLA’s Net Profit Margin of 3.95% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JD

0.27%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
26.71%
Q3
18.18%
Median
11.24%
Q1
7.67%
Min
0.27%

JD’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.27% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TSLA

5.00%

Automobiles Industry
Max
29.52%
Q3
5.00%
Median
0.93%
Q1
-12.05%
Min
-12.05%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.00% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)8.55%4.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.81%2.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.50%3.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.27%5.00%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.04%19.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JD

1.22

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
3.72
Q3
2.34
Median
1.48
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

JD’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.30
Q3
2.04
Median
1.36
Q1
1.07
Min
0.43

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JD

0.33

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
2.11
Q3
1.36
Median
0.56
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

JD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.11

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.62
Q3
2.04
Median
1.06
Q1
0.56
Min
0.11

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JD

6.46

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
9.56
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

JD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry
Max
75.55
Q3
38.91
Median
-4.07
Q1
-12.63
Min
-19.30

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.222.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.330.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.4671.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)1.53%15.78%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)12.97%2.25%
3-Year Revenue CAGR7.76%5.19%
5-Year Revenue CAGR11.91%24.63%

EPS Growth

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)--16.01%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-51.90%-39.08%
3-Year EPS CAGR26.41%-33.28%
5-Year EPS CAGR-16.14%38.32%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
5.86%
Q3
2.83%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry
Max
7.99%
Q3
3.26%
Median
0.97%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
120.88%
Q3
68.73%
Median
26.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry
Max
94.23%
Q3
44.69%
Median
9.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JD

12.78

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
41.44
Q3
26.94
Median
20.83
Q1
10.05
Min
6.54

JD’s P/E Ratio of 12.78 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TSLA

416.56

Automobiles Industry
Max
34.14
Q3
34.14
Median
21.57
Q1
9.96
Min
8.03

At 416.56, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JD

0.19

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
5.49
Q3
2.86
Median
1.89
Q1
0.90
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s P/S Ratio of 0.19 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TSLA

16.44

Automobiles Industry
Max
3.21
Q3
2.02
Median
0.75
Q1
0.38
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 16.44, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JD

1.13

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
9.90
Q3
5.46
Median
3.50
Q1
1.79
Min
0.79

JD’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TSLA

16.58

Automobiles Industry
Max
18.12
Q3
12.00
Median
1.54
Q1
1.07
Min
0.34

TSLA’s P/B Ratio of 16.58 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JD vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJDTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.78416.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.1916.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.1316.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.54229.82