Seek Returns logo

JD vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JD and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

JD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MGA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolJDMGA
Company NameJD.com, Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryChinaCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization45.62 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 22, 2014October 5, 1984
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JD and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JD vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJDMGA
5-Day Price Return-2.08%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return-8.92%20.18%
26-Week Price Return-21.52%10.53%
52-Week Price Return-46.37%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return-0.33%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return-9.93%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume14.11M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.69M1.51M
3-Month Volatility28.00%27.61%
Beta1.571.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JD

16.63%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

JD’s Return on Equity of 16.63% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JD

3.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s Net Profit Margin of 3.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JD

2.52%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

JD’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.52% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJDMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)16.63%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.67%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.06%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.52%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.02%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JD

1.22

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

JD’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JD

0.32

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

JD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JD

6.46

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

JD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJDMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.320.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.468.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

JD vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JD vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJDMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JD

8.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s P/E Ratio of 8.45 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JD

0.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JD

1.64

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

JD’s P/B Ratio of 1.64 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JD vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJDMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.4510.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.260.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.640.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.626.83