Seek Returns logo

JD vs. LI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JD and LI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both JD and LI are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolJDLI
Company NameJD.com, Inc.Li Auto Inc.
CountryChinaChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobiles
Market Capitalization45.62 billion USD23.93 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 22, 2014July 30, 2020
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JD and LI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JD vs. LI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJDLI
5-Day Price Return-2.08%-3.71%
13-Week Price Return-8.92%-18.72%
26-Week Price Return-21.52%-9.20%
52-Week Price Return-46.37%142.14%
Month-to-Date Return-0.33%-11.13%
Year-to-Date Return-9.93%-1.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume14.11M19.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.69M16.53M
3-Month Volatility28.00%47.62%
Beta1.571.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JD

16.63%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

JD’s Return on Equity of 16.63% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JD

3.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s Net Profit Margin of 3.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JD

2.52%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

JD’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.52% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJDLI
Return on Equity (TTM)16.63%11.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.67%5.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.06%5.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.52%5.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.02%20.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JD

1.22

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

JD’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JD

0.32

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

JD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JD

6.46

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

JD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJDLI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.320.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.46-16.94

Growth

Revenue Growth

JD vs. LI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JD vs. LI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJDLI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JD

8.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s P/E Ratio of 8.45 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LI

21.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.28 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JD

0.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, JD’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JD

1.64

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

JD’s P/B Ratio of 1.64 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LI

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JD vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJDLI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.4521.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.261.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.642.71
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.628.74