Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. TTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and TTD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJBLTTD
Company NameJabil Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsMedia
Market Capitalization22.41 billion USD25.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateMay 3, 1993September 21, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and TTD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. TTD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLTTD
5-Day Price Return1.33%-0.30%
13-Week Price Return26.49%-29.54%
26-Week Price Return23.51%-31.77%
52-Week Price Return94.92%-49.24%
Month-to-Date Return-6.42%-39.78%
Year-to-Date Return45.13%-55.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.42M16.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.35M12.59M
3-Month Volatility32.82%86.74%
Beta1.271.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TTD

15.19%

Media Industry

Max
34.77%
Q3
16.01%
Median
10.70%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.36%

TTD’s Return on Equity of 15.19% is on par with the norm for the Media industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TTD

15.57%

Media Industry

Max
16.04%
Q3
10.15%
Median
5.18%
Q1
2.39%
Min
-3.66%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.57% places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TTD

17.73%

Media Industry

Max
24.65%
Q3
13.68%
Median
8.96%
Q1
4.53%
Min
-8.09%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLTTD
Return on Equity (TTM)38.64%15.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.25%7.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%15.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.08%17.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%79.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TTD

1.71

Media Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.79
Median
1.39
Q1
0.92
Min
0.24

TTD’s Current Ratio of 1.71 aligns with the median group of the Media industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TTD

0.03

Media Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.06
Median
0.58
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Media industry, TTD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTD

44.57

Media Industry

Max
44.57
Q3
23.07
Median
4.52
Q1
2.14
Min
-10.82

TTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 44.57 is in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLTTD
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.981.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.471.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.1244.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. TTD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. TTD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TTD

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
7.76%
Q3
4.16%
Median
1.67%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTD

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
165.03%
Q3
96.17%
Median
45.64%
Q1
14.80%
Min
0.00%

TTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLTTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.59%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTD

61.22

Media Industry

Max
49.10
Q3
35.07
Median
17.34
Q1
10.39
Min
5.81

At 61.22, TTD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Media industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TTD

9.53

Media Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.85
Median
1.05
Q1
0.78
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 9.53, TTD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Media industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTD

13.12

Media Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.57
Median
1.83
Q1
1.19
Min
0.51

At 13.12, TTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Media industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLTTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9761.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.779.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.0413.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.8234.25