Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. PLXS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and PLXS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJBLPLXS
Company NameJabil Inc.Plexus Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization21.69 billion USD3.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 3, 1993February 5, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and PLXS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. PLXS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLXS
5-Day Price Return-5.79%1.32%
13-Week Price Return-10.59%3.69%
26-Week Price Return48.51%13.29%
52-Week Price Return69.86%7.51%
Month-to-Date Return-6.95%0.32%
Year-to-Date Return40.43%-7.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.96M0.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.55M0.18M
3-Month Volatility35.21%35.54%
Beta1.260.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PLXS

12.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

PLXS’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PLXS

4.04%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

PLXS’s Net Profit Margin of 4.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PLXS

5.05%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

PLXS’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.05% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLXS
Return on Equity (TTM)45.71%12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.64%5.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.20%4.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.97%5.05%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.88%10.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PLXS

1.58

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

PLXS’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PLXS

0.10

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, PLXS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.10 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PLXS

6.18

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

PLXS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.18 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLXS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.001.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.510.69
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.910.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.086.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. PLXS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. PLXS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PLXS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

PLXS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PLXS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

PLXS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLXS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.16%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)5.48%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

33.38

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 33.38 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PLXS

24.65

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

PLXS’s P/E Ratio of 24.65 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PLXS

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, PLXS’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PLXS

2.58

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

PLXS’s P/B Ratio of 2.58 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL vs. PLXS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLXS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.3824.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.741.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.532.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7116.00