Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. PLTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and PLTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJBLPLTR
Company NameJabil Inc.Palantir Technologies Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSoftware
Market Capitalization22.41 billion USD372.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 3, 1993September 30, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and PLTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. PLTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLTR
5-Day Price Return1.33%-0.37%
13-Week Price Return26.49%28.52%
26-Week Price Return23.51%40.26%
52-Week Price Return94.92%392.39%
Month-to-Date Return-6.42%-0.75%
Year-to-Date Return45.13%107.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.42M92.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.35M83.69M
3-Month Volatility32.82%50.24%
Beta1.272.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PLTR

14.64%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

PLTR’s Return on Equity of 14.64% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PLTR

22.18%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.18% places PLTR in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PLTR

16.55%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

PLTR’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.55% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLTR
Return on Equity (TTM)38.64%14.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.25%11.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%22.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.08%16.55%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%80.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PLTR

6.32

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

PLTR’s Current Ratio of 6.32 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PLTR

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

PLTR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PLTR

-1.53

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

PLTR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.53. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLTR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.986.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.476.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.12-1.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. PLTR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. PLTR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PLTR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PLTR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PLTR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PLTR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.59%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PLTR

485.17

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

At 485.17, PLTR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PLTR

107.63

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 107.63, PLTR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PLTR

54.26

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 54.26, PLTR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL vs. PLTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLPLTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.97485.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.77107.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.0454.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.82216.73