Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. PAYC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and PAYC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJBLPAYC
Company NameJabil Inc.Paycom Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization22.41 billion USD12.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 3, 1993April 15, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and PAYC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. PAYC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLPAYC
5-Day Price Return1.33%1.25%
13-Week Price Return26.49%-11.75%
26-Week Price Return23.51%6.76%
52-Week Price Return94.92%44.11%
Month-to-Date Return-6.42%-0.33%
Year-to-Date Return45.13%12.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.42M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.35M0.60M
3-Month Volatility32.82%30.58%
Beta1.270.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAYC

25.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

PAYC’s Return on Equity of 25.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PAYC

21.21%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.21% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PAYC

28.10%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.10% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLPAYC
Return on Equity (TTM)38.64%25.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.25%9.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%21.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.08%28.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%82.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PAYC

1.30

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

PAYC’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PAYC

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, PAYC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAYC

191.88

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 191.88, PAYC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLPAYC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.981.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.471.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.12191.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. PAYC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. PAYC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAYC

0.65%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAYC

20.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLPAYC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.59%20.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAYC

31.73

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

PAYC’s P/E Ratio of 31.73 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PAYC

6.73

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

PAYC’s P/S Ratio of 6.73 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAYC

7.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

PAYC’s P/B Ratio of 7.19 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLPAYC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9731.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.776.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.047.19
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.8237.18