Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. ORCL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and ORCL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJBLORCL
Company NameJabil Inc.Oracle Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSoftware
Market Capitalization21.90 billion USD660.24 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 3, 1993March 12, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and ORCL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. ORCL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLORCL
5-Day Price Return-6.14%-4.04%
13-Week Price Return21.86%47.24%
26-Week Price Return20.98%35.20%
52-Week Price Return89.88%70.43%
Month-to-Date Return-8.57%-7.37%
Year-to-Date Return41.80%41.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.45M11.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.36M11.85M
3-Month Volatility32.75%43.02%
Beta1.271.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ORCL

80.61%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ORCL’s Return on Equity of 80.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ORCL

21.68%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.68% places ORCL in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ORCL

30.80%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.80% places ORCL in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLORCL
Return on Equity (TTM)38.64%80.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.25%8.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%21.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.08%30.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%70.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ORCL

0.75

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ORCL’s Current Ratio of 0.75 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ORCL

4.53

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.53, ORCL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ORCL

4.92

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ORCL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLORCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.980.75
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.470.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.244.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.124.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. ORCL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. ORCL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ORCL

0.73%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ORCL’s Dividend Yield of 0.73% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ORCL

38.12%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 38.12%, ORCL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLORCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.59%38.12%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ORCL

52.31

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

ORCL’s P/E Ratio of 52.31 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ORCL

11.34

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ORCL’s P/S Ratio of 11.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ORCL

22.84

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ORCL’s P/B Ratio of 22.84 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JBL vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLORCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9752.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.7711.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.0422.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.8276.77