Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. OKTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and OKTA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolJBLOKTA
Company NameJabil Inc.Okta, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsIT Services
Market Capitalization23.16 billion USD16.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 3, 1993April 7, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and OKTA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. OKTA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLOKTA
5-Day Price Return2.21%2.04%
13-Week Price Return-0.60%-8.27%
26-Week Price Return54.12%-19.58%
52-Week Price Return79.29%23.94%
Month-to-Date Return-1.07%-1.15%
Year-to-Date Return49.30%16.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.19M2.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.53M3.97M
3-Month Volatility33.42%32.47%
Beta1.260.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

OKTA

2.59%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

OKTA’s Return on Equity of 2.59% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

OKTA

6.08%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

OKTA’s Net Profit Margin of 6.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

OKTA

3.18%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

OKTA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.18% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLOKTA
Return on Equity (TTM)45.71%2.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.64%1.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.20%6.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.97%3.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.88%76.91%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

OKTA

1.35

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

OKTA’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

OKTA

0.13

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, OKTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

OKTA

-9.31

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

OKTA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLOKTA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.001.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.910.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.08-9.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. OKTA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. OKTA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

OKTA

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OKTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OKTA

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OKTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLOKTA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.16%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)5.48%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

35.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 35.24 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OKTA

95.72

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

At 95.72, OKTA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the IT Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.78

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.78 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

OKTA

5.82

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

OKTA’s P/S Ratio of 5.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

OKTA

2.54

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

OKTA’s P/B Ratio of 2.54 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLOKTA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.2495.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.785.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.532.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.7619.19