J vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at J and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	J	LMT
Company Name	Jacobs Solutions Inc.	Lockheed Martin Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Aerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization	17.58 billion USD	104.53 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of J and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

J vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	J	LMT
5-Day Price Return	-0.45%	1.50%
13-Week Price Return	16.00%	-4.83%
26-Week Price Return	12.81%	3.41%
52-Week Price Return	19.47%	-19.62%
Month-to-Date Return	3.69%	6.35%
Year-to-Date Return	10.09%	-7.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.58M	1.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.74M	1.67M
3-Month Volatility	19.39%	30.49%
Beta	0.82	0.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

J

4.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.17%
Q3: 30.06%
Median: 22.21%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -13.44%

J’s Return on Equity of 4.22% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 22.42%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: -6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

J

1.88%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 26.06%
Q3: 13.34%
Median: 7.88%
Q1: 3.50%
Min: -2.93%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, J’s Net Profit Margin of 1.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.54%
Q3: 8.08%
Median: 6.17%
Q1: 2.49%
Min: -1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

J

7.12%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 35.84%
Q3: 19.38%
Median: 12.54%
Q1: 7.36%
Min: -5.21%

J’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.12% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 16.63%
Q3: 10.38%
Median: 8.29%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: 0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	J	LMT
Return on Equity (TTM)	4.22%	65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.46%	7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.88%	5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.12%	8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	24.99%	8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

J

1.39

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.45
Q3: 1.65
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

J’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.09
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

J

0.66

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.63
Q3: 1.44
Median: 0.91
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.00

J’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.70
Q3: 1.04
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

J

6.77

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.67
Q3: 20.05
Median: 11.07
Q1: 5.36
Min: -2.22

J’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.77 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.90
Median: 7.04
Q1: 2.40
Min: -7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	J	LMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.39	0.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.36	0.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.66	4.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.77	7.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

J vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

J vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

J

0.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 5.28%
Q3: 2.51%
Median: 1.63%
Q1: 0.62%
Min: 0.00%

J’s Dividend Yield of 0.86% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT

2.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.03%
Q3: 1.22%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

J

42.29%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 109.23%
Q3: 64.39%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 20.35%
Min: 0.00%

J’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.29% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 83.87%
Q3: 49.90%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	J	LMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.86%	2.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	42.29%	73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

J

104.84

Professional Services Industry

Max: 49.59
Q3: 36.59
Median: 28.13
Q1: 18.55
Min: 10.07

At 104.84, J’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LMT

24.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 65.97
Q3: 54.11
Median: 34.53
Q1: 23.66
Min: 0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.64 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

J

1.97

Professional Services Industry

Max: 9.54
Q3: 5.11
Median: 2.10
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.11

J’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT

1.44

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 8.07
Q3: 4.49
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.39
Min: 0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

J

4.09

Professional Services Industry

Max: 13.75
Q3: 8.87
Median: 4.35
Q1: 2.43
Min: 0.54

J’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.67
Q3: 7.92
Median: 4.65
Q1: 2.68
Min: 0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

J vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	J	LMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	104.84	24.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.97	1.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.09	20.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	33.31	20.78