Seek Returns logo

ITW vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ITW and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolITWLUV
Company NameIllinois Tool Works Inc.Southwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization75.79 billion USD17.08 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 13, 1973January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ITW and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ITW vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolITWLUV
5-Day Price Return-0.53%-0.73%
13-Week Price Return0.58%-4.58%
26-Week Price Return4.83%-3.16%
52-Week Price Return-0.72%9.98%
Month-to-Date Return-0.29%1.91%
Year-to-Date Return2.54%-3.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.77M9.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.92M10.47M
3-Month Volatility16.53%39.87%
Beta1.171.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ITW

102.30%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

ITW’s Return on Equity of 102.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
27.29%
Median
16.68%
Q1
8.40%
Min
-15.23%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ITW

21.31%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

ITW’s Net Profit Margin of 21.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
16.00%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.35%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-4.22%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ITW

25.98%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.98% places ITW in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-2.30%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolITWLUV
Return on Equity (TTM)102.30%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.57%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.31%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.98%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.74%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ITW

1.59

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

ITW’s Current Ratio of 1.59 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.91
Median
0.73
Q1
0.54
Min
0.18

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ITW

2.78

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.78, ITW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
5.04
Median
1.27
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ITW

20.06

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

ITW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolITWLUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.590.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.040.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.780.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.069.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

ITW vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ITW vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ITW

2.28%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

ITW’s Dividend Yield of 2.28% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LUV

2.45%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.04%
Q3
3.76%
Median
1.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.45% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ITW

51.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

ITW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.65% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
99.73%
Q3
50.30%
Median
23.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolITWLUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.28%2.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)51.65%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ITW

22.62

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

ITW’s P/E Ratio of 22.62 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV

44.50

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.74
Q3
11.24
Median
8.33
Q1
6.11
Min
2.97

At 44.50, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ITW

4.82

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

ITW’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LUV

0.64

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
0.73
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ITW

22.57

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 22.57, ITW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
3.19
Median
1.94
Q1
1.28
Min
0.50

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ITW vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolITWLUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.6244.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.820.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.572.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.9446.52