ITUB vs. MA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ITUB and MA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ITUB trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MA is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	ITUB	MA
Company Name	Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.	Mastercard Incorporated
Country	Brazil	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	71.09 billion USD	535.79 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 25, 2002	May 25, 2006
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ITUB and MA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ITUB vs. MA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ITUB	MA
5-Day Price Return	-3.61%	1.53%
13-Week Price Return	-5.20%	1.07%
26-Week Price Return	15.27%	4.66%
52-Week Price Return	7.81%	26.92%
Month-to-Date Return	3.27%	4.63%
Year-to-Date Return	29.96%	12.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume	25.83M	2.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume	22.88M	2.71M
3-Month Volatility	19.76%	21.60%
Beta	0.47	0.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ITUB

20.76%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, ITUB’s Return on Equity of 20.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ITUB

17.96%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, ITUB’s Net Profit Margin of 17.96% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ITUB

21.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

ITUB’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.93% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ITUB	MA
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.76%	191.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.50%	27.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	17.96%	44.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	21.93%	55.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ITUB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ITUB

4.50

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ITUB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ITUB	MA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	4.50	2.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	37.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

ITUB vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ITUB vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ITUB

7.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.00%, ITUB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MA

0.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ITUB

51.88%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

ITUB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.88% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ITUB	MA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	7.00%	0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	51.88%	19.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ITUB

9.00

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

ITUB’s P/E Ratio of 9.00 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MA

39.22

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 39.22 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ITUB

1.38

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

MA

17.62

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ITUB

1.58

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

ITUB’s P/B Ratio of 1.58 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ITUB vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ITUB	MA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	9.00	39.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.38	17.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.58	64.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.95	33.58