Seek Returns logo

ITT vs. UAL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ITT and UAL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolITTUAL
Company NameITT Inc.United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization14.09 billion USD31.70 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 15, 1995February 6, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ITT and UAL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ITT vs. UAL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolITTUAL
5-Day Price Return1.56%-4.82%
13-Week Price Return13.98%21.19%
26-Week Price Return29.53%23.92%
52-Week Price Return19.17%66.41%
Month-to-Date Return5.00%-8.10%
Year-to-Date Return25.11%-0.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.49M5.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.40M6.41M
3-Month Volatility23.55%44.99%
Beta1.421.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ITT

19.08%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

ITT’s Return on Equity of 19.08% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UAL

26.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
27.29%
Median
16.68%
Q1
8.40%
Min
-15.23%

UAL’s Return on Equity of 26.43% is on par with the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ITT

13.99%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.99% places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UAL

5.71%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
16.00%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.35%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-4.22%

UAL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ITT

18.75%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.75% places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UAL

8.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-2.30%

UAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolITTUAL
Return on Equity (TTM)19.08%26.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.61%4.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.99%5.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.75%8.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.96%64.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ITT

1.45

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

ITT’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UAL

0.70

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.91
Median
0.73
Q1
0.54
Min
0.18

UAL’s Current Ratio of 0.70 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ITT

0.42

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ITT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UAL

2.02

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
5.04
Median
1.27
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

UAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02 is typical for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ITT

20.74

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

ITT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.74 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UAL

5.76

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

UAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolITTUAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.450.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.930.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.422.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.745.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

ITT vs. UAL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ITT vs. UAL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ITT

0.78%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

ITT’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.04%
Q3
3.76%
Median
1.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ITT

20.93%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

ITT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.93% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
99.73%
Q3
50.30%
Median
23.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolITTUAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.78%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.93%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ITT

26.99

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

ITT’s P/E Ratio of 26.99 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UAL

9.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.74
Q3
11.24
Median
8.33
Q1
6.11
Min
2.97

UAL’s P/E Ratio of 9.16 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ITT

3.77

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

ITT’s P/S Ratio of 3.77 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UAL

0.52

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
0.73
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.09

UAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ITT

4.83

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

ITT’s P/B Ratio of 4.83 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UAL

1.94

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
3.19
Median
1.94
Q1
1.28
Min
0.50

UAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.94 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ITT vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolITTUAL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.999.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.770.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.831.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.807.50