Seek Returns logo

IRTC vs. NVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IRTC and NVS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

IRTC is a standard domestic listing, while NVS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolIRTCNVS
Company NameiRhythm Technologies, Inc.Novartis AG
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization5.64 billion USD256.29 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 20, 2016November 7, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IRTC and NVS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IRTC vs. NVS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIRTCNVS
5-Day Price Return3.60%5.71%
13-Week Price Return23.26%7.46%
26-Week Price Return67.76%6.93%
52-Week Price Return147.23%9.24%
Month-to-Date Return2.10%3.90%
Year-to-Date Return94.75%17.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.37M3.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.45M2.83M
3-Month Volatility47.74%19.32%
Beta1.090.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IRTC

-104.74%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

IRTC has a negative Return on Equity of -104.74%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NVS

32.56%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

In the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, NVS’s Return on Equity of 32.56% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IRTC

-14.06%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

IRTC has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.06%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NVS

24.90%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.90% places NVS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IRTC

-16.08%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

IRTC has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -16.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NVS

30.03%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.03% places NVS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIRTCNVS
Return on Equity (TTM)-104.74%32.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.91%13.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.06%24.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-16.08%30.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.78%76.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IRTC

5.02

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

IRTC’s Current Ratio of 5.02 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NVS

0.82

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

NVS’s Current Ratio of 0.82 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IRTC

6.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.25, IRTC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

NVS

0.77

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

NVS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IRTC

-32.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

IRTC has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -32.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NVS

22.55

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

NVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.55 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIRTCNVS
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.020.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.750.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)6.250.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-32.6022.55

Growth

Revenue Growth

IRTC vs. NVS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IRTC vs. NVS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IRTC

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IRTC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NVS

3.15%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

NVS’s Dividend Yield of 3.15% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IRTC

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IRTC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NVS

102.24%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

NVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 102.24% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIRTCNVS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.15%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%102.24%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IRTC

--

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

P/E Ratio data for IRTC is currently unavailable.

NVS

18.20

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

NVS’s P/E Ratio of 18.20 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IRTC

8.58

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

IRTC’s P/S Ratio of 8.58 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NVS

4.53

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

NVS’s P/S Ratio of 4.53 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IRTC

47.42

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

At 47.42, IRTC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NVS

6.07

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

NVS’s P/B Ratio of 6.07 is in the upper tier for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IRTC vs. NVS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIRTCNVS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--18.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.584.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)47.426.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)186.7514.79