IR vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at IR and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	IR	XYL
Company Name	Ingersoll Rand Inc.	Xylem Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Machinery
Market Capitalization	33.19 billion USD	36.00 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 12, 2017	October 13, 2011
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	IR	XYL
5-Day Price Return	2.11%	4.27%
13-Week Price Return	-0.67%	14.02%
26-Week Price Return	1.52%	19.79%
52-Week Price Return	-15.76%	9.66%
Month-to-Date Return	4.02%	4.20%
Year-to-Date Return	-8.67%	27.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.80M	1.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.06M	1.20M
3-Month Volatility	34.44%	25.90%
Beta	1.45	1.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.06%

Machinery Industry

Max: 33.68%
Q3: 20.05%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.67%
Min: -7.69%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max: 33.68%
Q3: 20.05%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.67%
Min: -7.69%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.04%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.72%
Q3: 11.07%
Median: 7.62%
Q1: 5.05%
Min: -1.52%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.72%
Q3: 11.07%
Median: 7.62%
Q1: 5.05%
Min: -1.52%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.07%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 15.99%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -0.51%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.07% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 15.99%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -0.51%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	IR	XYL
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.06%	8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.85%	5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.04%	10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.07%	11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	43.74%	37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.29

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.13
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.77

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.29 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.13
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.77

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.56
Q3: 0.79
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.56
Q3: 0.79
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max: 81.58
Q3: 37.68
Median: 13.76
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max: 81.58
Q3: 37.68
Median: 13.76
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	IR	XYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.29	1.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.63	1.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.47	0.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.23	55.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.10%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.55%
Q3: 2.66%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 1.23%
Min: 0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

XYL

1.03%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.55%
Q3: 2.66%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 1.23%
Min: 0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.95%

Machinery Industry

Max: 198.34%
Q3: 101.42%
Median: 62.79%
Q1: 29.85%
Min: 0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.95% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max: 198.34%
Q3: 101.42%
Median: 62.79%
Q1: 29.85%
Min: 0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	IR	XYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.10%	1.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	3.95%	39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

63.92

Machinery Industry

Max: 47.95
Q3: 30.11
Median: 22.35
Q1: 16.56
Min: 6.48

At 63.92, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

XYL

38.28

Machinery Industry

Max: 47.95
Q3: 30.11
Median: 22.35
Q1: 16.56
Min: 6.48

A P/E Ratio of 38.28 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

4.50

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.97
Q3: 2.76
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.04

IR’s P/S Ratio of 4.50 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYL

4.11

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.97
Q3: 2.76
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.04

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.11 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.29
Q3: 4.06
Median: 2.67
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.29
Q3: 4.06
Median: 2.67
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	IR	XYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	63.92	38.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.50	4.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.33	2.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	25.52	41.22