Seek Returns logo

IR vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IR and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIRUPS
Company NameIngersoll Rand Inc.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization29.48 billion USD80.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 12, 2017November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIRUPS
5-Day Price Return-2.30%3.14%
13-Week Price Return-3.64%8.48%
26-Week Price Return-10.69%-3.84%
52-Week Price Return-27.68%-28.20%
Month-to-Date Return-1.13%-0.46%
Year-to-Date Return-16.57%-23.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.19M6.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.32M8.15M
3-Month Volatility25.09%26.12%
Beta1.341.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.29%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UPS

34.41%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
18.50%
Q3
17.86%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.72%
Min
3.03%

UPS’s Return on Equity of 34.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.25%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UPS

6.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.55%
Q3
5.92%
Median
4.17%
Q1
2.52%
Min
0.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.15% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.14%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.14% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UPS

9.18%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.95%
Median
5.96%
Q1
3.78%
Min
1.22%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.18% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIRUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)5.29%34.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.98%7.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.25%6.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.14%9.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.72%82.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.16

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UPS

1.30

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.79
Q3
1.36
Median
1.15
Q1
0.93
Min
0.71

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.22
Median
0.76
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIRUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.161.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.511.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.471.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.239.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.11%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UPS

6.73%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.05%
Q3
3.28%
Median
2.07%
Q1
0.51%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.73%, UPS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UPS

98.06%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
98.33%
Median
59.97%
Q1
12.62%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.06% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIRUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.11%6.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.67%98.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

53.96

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

At 53.96, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UPS

14.56

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.35
Q3
24.81
Median
17.35
Q1
14.31
Min
9.29

UPS’s P/E Ratio of 14.56 is within the middle range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.91

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

IR’s P/S Ratio of 3.91 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UPS

0.90

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.26
Q3
1.51
Median
0.65
Q1
0.42
Min
0.19

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.24

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.24 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UPS

4.47

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
4.47
Q3
3.13
Median
2.01
Q1
1.52
Min
0.74

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 4.47 is in the upper tier for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIRUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)53.9614.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.910.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.244.47
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.3615.50