Seek Returns logo

IR vs. TRI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IR and TRI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIRTRI
Company NameIngersoll Rand Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryProfessional Services
Market Capitalization32.05 billion USD80.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 12, 2017June 12, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and TRI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. TRI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIRTRI
5-Day Price Return2.21%3.39%
13-Week Price Return-0.69%-8.27%
26-Week Price Return-7.05%0.21%
52-Week Price Return-11.55%9.38%
Month-to-Date Return-4.73%-11.23%
Year-to-Date Return-10.87%6.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.58M0.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.01M0.37M
3-Month Volatility34.10%29.71%
Beta1.450.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.06%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.04%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.07%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.07% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIRTRI
Return on Equity (TTM)5.06%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.85%8.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.04%22.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.07%29.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.74%95.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.29

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.29 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIRTRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.290.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.630.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.470.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.2317.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TRI

1.26%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.95% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIRTRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%1.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.95%60.86%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

60.90

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

At 60.90, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TRI

48.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 48.19 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

4.29

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

IR’s P/S Ratio of 4.29 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TRI

10.77

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 10.77, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRI

7.05

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.05 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IR vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIRTRI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.9048.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.2910.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.337.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.3241.75