IR vs. SNA: Ingersoll Rand vs. Snap-on Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Snap-on (SNA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Snap-on (SNA) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 18.94 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | 12.48% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 15.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 14.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 19.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.73 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -20.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 333.56K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | 0.42 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.63 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% and Snap-on (SNA) at 17.32% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
17.32%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- SNA
- 17.32%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% and Snap-on (SNA) at 19.21% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
19.21%
- Max
- 27.47%
- SNA
- 19.21%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% and Snap-on (SNA) at 24.88% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
24.88%
- Max
- 36.60%
- SNA
- 24.88%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 17.32% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 9.70% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 19.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 24.88% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 51.87% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Snap-on (SNA) at 0.93% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Snap-on (SNA) at -1.64% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 0.93% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 2.11% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | -1.64% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | 4.49% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Snap-on (SNA) at 3.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
3.55
- Max
- 5.22
- SNA
- 3.55
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Snap-on (SNA) at 0.21 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
0.21
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- SNA
- 0.21
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 3.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | -0.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Snap-on (SNA) at 2.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, SNA the richer one.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
2.66%
- SNA
- 2.66%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Snap-on (SNA) at 50.70% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
50.70%
- Max
- 67.39%
- SNA
- 50.70%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 2.66% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 50.70% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Snap-on (SNA) at 19.08 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SNA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
19.08
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- SNA
- 19.08
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Snap-on (SNA) at 3.60 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
3.60
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- SNA
- 3.60
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 and Snap-on (SNA) at 3.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
3.11
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- SNA
- 3.11
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 19.08 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 3.60 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 3.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 5.77% |