Seek Returns logo

IR vs. SNA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IR and SNA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIRSNA
Company NameIngersoll Rand Inc.Snap-on Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
Market Capitalization29.48 billion USD17.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 12, 2017February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and SNA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. SNA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIRSNA
5-Day Price Return-2.30%-3.85%
13-Week Price Return-3.64%1.22%
26-Week Price Return-10.69%0.81%
52-Week Price Return-27.68%-8.66%
Month-to-Date Return-1.13%-1.66%
Year-to-Date Return-16.57%-2.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.19M0.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.32M0.32M
3-Month Volatility25.09%19.91%
Beta1.340.81

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.29%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SNA

18.07%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.07% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.25%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SNA

19.83%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

SNA’s Net Profit Margin of 19.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.14%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.14% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNA

25.80%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.80% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIRSNA
Return on Equity (TTM)5.29%18.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.98%12.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.25%19.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.14%25.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.72%51.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.16

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNA

4.40

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIRSNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.164.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.513.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.470.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.2365.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.11%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SNA

2.61%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.61% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SNA

44.15%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.15% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIRSNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.11%2.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.67%44.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

53.96

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

At 53.96, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SNA

16.92

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 16.92 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.91

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

IR’s P/S Ratio of 3.91 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNA

3.35

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.24

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.24 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SNA

3.09

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIRSNA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)53.9616.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.913.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.243.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.3616.72