IR vs. PCAR: Ingersoll Rand vs. PACCAR Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and PACCAR (PCAR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and PACCAR (PCAR) both belong to the Machinery industry, though IR is classified under Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components while PCAR falls under Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment.
| Profile Item | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | PACCAR Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 53.69 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | 9.49% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 11.04% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 16.64% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 27.23% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.94 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -27.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 3.33M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.30 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% and PACCAR (PCAR) at 13.71% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
13.71%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PCAR
- 13.71%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of PACCAR (PCAR) at 9.50%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
9.50%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- PCAR
- 9.50%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of PACCAR (PCAR) at 12.59%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
12.59%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- PCAR
- 12.59%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 13.71% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 4.53% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 9.50% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 12.59% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 14.21% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while PACCAR (PCAR) at -15.50% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% and PACCAR (PCAR) at -42.91% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | -15.50% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | -0.44% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | -42.91% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | -7.80% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while PACCAR (PCAR) at 5.47 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
5.47
- PCAR
- 5.47
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 and PACCAR (PCAR) at 0.72 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
0.72
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PCAR
- 0.72
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 5.47 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.62 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
PACCAR (PCAR) at 1.30% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PCAR the richer one.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
1.30%
- Max
- 2.66%
- PCAR
- 1.30%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% and PACCAR (PCAR) at 25.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
25.95%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PCAR
- 25.95%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 1.30% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 25.95% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
PACCAR (PCAR) at 19.46 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for PCAR, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
19.46
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- PCAR
- 19.46
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
PACCAR (PCAR) at 1.85 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
1.85
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- PCAR
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 and PACCAR (PCAR) at 2.57 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PCAR
Capital Goods industry group
2.57
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- PCAR
- 2.57
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 19.46 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 1.85 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 2.57 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 3.23% |