IR vs. JBLU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at IR and JBLU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	IR	JBLU
Company Name	Ingersoll Rand Inc.	JetBlue Airways Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Passenger Airlines
Market Capitalization	32.05 billion USD	1.92 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	May 12, 2017	April 12, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and JBLU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. JBLU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	IR	JBLU
5-Day Price Return	4.12%	4.13%
13-Week Price Return	-2.36%	-2.40%
26-Week Price Return	-3.64%	-24.54%
52-Week Price Return	-11.19%	9.07%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.71%	19.14%
Year-to-Date Return	-10.86%	-32.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.50M	16.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.05M	22.52M
3-Month Volatility	34.08%	58.12%
Beta	1.45	1.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.06%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

JBLU

-15.23%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

JBLU has a negative Return on Equity of -15.23%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.04%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBLU

-4.22%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

JBLU has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.22%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.07%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.07% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBLU

-1.84%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

JBLU has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	IR	JBLU
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.06%	-15.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.85%	-2.29%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.04%	-4.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.07%	-1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	43.74%	69.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.29

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.29 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBLU

0.88

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

JBLU’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBLU

3.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

JBLU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.51 is typical for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

JBLU

-2.37

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

JBLU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.37. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	IR	JBLU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.29	0.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.63	0.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.47	3.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.23	-2.37

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. JBLU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. JBLU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.10%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

JBLU

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

JBLU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.95%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.95% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

JBLU

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

JBLU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	IR	JBLU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.10%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	3.95%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

60.90

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

At 60.90, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBLU

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

P/E Ratio data for JBLU is currently unavailable.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

4.29

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

IR’s P/S Ratio of 4.29 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBLU

0.21

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, JBLU’s P/S Ratio of 0.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBLU

0.62

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

JBLU’s P/B Ratio of 0.62 is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IR vs. JBLU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	IR	JBLU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	60.90	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.29	0.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.33	0.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.32	8.13