Seek Returns logo

IPGP vs. KLAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IPGP and KLAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPGPKLAC
Company NameIPG Photonics CorporationKLA Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization3.47 billion USD114.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 13, 2006October 8, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IPGP and KLAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IPGP vs. KLAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPGPKLAC
5-Day Price Return4.17%-1.48%
13-Week Price Return25.53%11.73%
26-Week Price Return28.42%14.77%
52-Week Price Return15.34%5.22%
Month-to-Date Return9.71%-1.00%
Year-to-Date Return12.98%38.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.20M1.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.27M1.10M
3-Month Volatility32.25%33.47%
Beta0.991.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IPGP

-10.38%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

IPGP has a negative Return on Equity of -10.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KLAC

102.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 102.56% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IPGP

-22.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

IPGP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.77%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KLAC

33.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.41% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IPGP

-25.10%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

IPGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -25.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KLAC

39.28%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.28% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPGPKLAC
Return on Equity (TTM)-10.38%102.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.22%26.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-22.77%33.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-25.10%39.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.65%61.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IPGP

6.79

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

IPGP’s Current Ratio of 6.79 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

KLAC

2.62

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.62 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IPGP

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, IPGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KLAC

1.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.25, KLAC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IPGP

199.25

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 199.25, IPGP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

KLAC

38.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPGPKLAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.792.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.081.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)199.2538.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

IPGP vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IPGP vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IPGP

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

IPGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KLAC

0.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IPGP

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

IPGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KLAC

22.27%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.27% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPGPKLAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IPGP

--

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

P/E Ratio data for IPGP is currently unavailable.

KLAC

28.39

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 28.39 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IPGP

3.41

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

IPGP’s P/S Ratio of 3.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KLAC

9.48

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 9.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IPGP

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

IPGP’s P/B Ratio of 1.39 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KLAC

25.24

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

At 25.24, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IPGP vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPGPKLAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--28.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.419.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.3925.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.5830.81