Seek Returns logo

IP vs. YUM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and YUM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPYUM
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyYum! Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization24.82 billion USD41.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962September 17, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and YUM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. YUM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPYUM
5-Day Price Return-1.57%1.75%
13-Week Price Return-6.89%-0.21%
26-Week Price Return-15.21%0.40%
52-Week Price Return-1.30%9.25%
Month-to-Date Return0.58%3.60%
Year-to-Date Return-12.65%11.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.60M2.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.33M2.02M
3-Month Volatility35.68%20.88%
Beta1.120.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

YUM

117.64%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

YUM’s Return on Equity of 117.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

YUM

18.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

YUM

30.93%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.93% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPYUM
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%117.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%21.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%18.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%30.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%46.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

YUM

0.82

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

YUM’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

YUM

30.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 30.97, YUM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

YUM

4.68

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

YUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPYUM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.330.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.5330.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.714.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

YUM

1.91%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.91% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

YUM

53.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.77% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPYUM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.25%1.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%53.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

YUM

28.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

YUM’s P/E Ratio of 28.18 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

YUM

5.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

YUM’s P/S Ratio of 5.10 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

YUM

208.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 208.10, YUM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IP vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPYUM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--28.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.145.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.33208.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.6426.29