Seek Returns logo

IP vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPSW
Company NameInternational Paper CompanySmurfit Westrock Plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization25.68 billion USD23.56 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPSW
5-Day Price Return1.25%3.01%
13-Week Price Return1.52%0.27%
26-Week Price Return-12.74%-17.75%
52-Week Price Return9.28%16.14%
Month-to-Date Return4.07%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return-9.62%-16.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.04M3.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.54M3.66M
3-Month Volatility39.95%33.88%
Beta1.121.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPSW
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPSW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.712.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.18% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SW

3.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.26% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPSW
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.18%3.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

SW

44.73

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

At 44.73, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.16

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SW

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.53 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IP vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPSW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--44.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.160.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.331.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.6845.25