Seek Returns logo

IP vs. STLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and STLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPSTLA
Company NameInternational Paper CompanyStellantis N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingAutomobiles
Market Capitalization25.81 billion USD29.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 9, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and STLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. STLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPSTLA
5-Day Price Return4.33%3.97%
13-Week Price Return0.47%-5.66%
26-Week Price Return-14.65%-35.63%
52-Week Price Return1.43%-41.33%
Month-to-Date Return4.60%11.37%
Year-to-Date Return-9.16%-31.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.78M17.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.33M23.55M
3-Month Volatility36.06%46.27%
Beta1.121.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPSTLA
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%-3.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%-1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%-1.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%-3.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%7.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPSTLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.7137.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STLA

6.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.09%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPSTLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.25%6.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%82.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STLA

0.22

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.22 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IP vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPSTLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.140.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.330.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.642.65