Seek Returns logo

IP vs. SN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and SN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPSN
Company NameInternational Paper CompanySharkNinja, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization26.08 billion USD16.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962July 31, 2023
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and SN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. SN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPSN
5-Day Price Return4.37%-2.97%
13-Week Price Return1.56%21.42%
26-Week Price Return-13.58%3.25%
52-Week Price Return2.98%28.45%
Month-to-Date Return5.67%-0.26%
Year-to-Date Return-8.23%18.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.85M1.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.34M1.64M
3-Month Volatility35.71%36.04%
Beta1.121.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPSN
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%26.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%11.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%11.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%48.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPSN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.961.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.719.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPSN
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.25%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

SN

32.37

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

At 32.37, SN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Durables industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SN

2.85

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.85, SN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IP vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPSN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--32.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.142.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.336.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.6436.62