Seek Returns logo

IP vs. SLGN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IP and SLGN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIPSLGN
Company NameInternational Paper CompanySilgan Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization24.82 billion USD4.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 14, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IP and SLGN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IP vs. SLGN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIPSLGN
5-Day Price Return-1.57%-1.45%
13-Week Price Return-6.89%-17.45%
26-Week Price Return-15.21%-12.93%
52-Week Price Return-1.30%-7.30%
Month-to-Date Return0.58%-0.45%
Year-to-Date Return-12.65%-11.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.60M0.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.33M0.82M
3-Month Volatility35.68%35.22%
Beta1.120.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SLGN

14.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

SLGN’s Return on Equity of 14.47% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SLGN

4.90%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

SLGN’s Net Profit Margin of 4.90% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SLGN

9.06%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SLGN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.06% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIPSLGN
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.20%14.47%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%3.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.12%4.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.07%9.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.30%17.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SLGN

0.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SLGN’s Current Ratio of 0.96 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SLGN

2.27

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SLGN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SLGN

3.09

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

SLGN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIPSLGN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.330.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.960.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.532.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.713.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

IP vs. SLGN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IP vs. SLGN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SLGN

1.72%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SLGN’s Dividend Yield of 1.72% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SLGN

27.80%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SLGN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.80% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIPSLGN
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.25%1.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)180.00%27.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

SLGN

16.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

SLGN’s P/E Ratio of 16.19 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SLGN

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

SLGN’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SLGN

2.61

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SLGN’s P/B Ratio of 2.61 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IP vs. SLGN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIPSLGN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--16.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.140.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.332.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.644.38